Spring Blog • June 5, 2015

 

 

2015 % of Lettermen Returning

Today’s blog continues my in-depth look at my NCAA Experience Chart. For seven years I had listed an experience chart, which broke down the number of seniors, juniors, sophomores and freshmen each team had in the two deep and rated the teams experience level with a formula I devised. In 2009, I made the experience chart FIVE TIMES better by adding new categories like Career Starts on Offensive line, % of Offensive Yards returning, % of Defensive Yards returning and % of lettermen returning. Today I will look at the returning letterman/lost percentages.

Last year I went back and looked at percentages of lettermen returning and lost. Using percentages is more reliable than the amount of returning or lost lettermen because schools give out letters in different manners. Some schools hand out a lot of letters and others far fewer. This year, the low’s were Eastern Michigan with just 40 while Fresno St handed out 51 with ULM and Miami Ohio each giving out 52. The teams at the top of the list gave out a lot more letters. Last year, Utah was number one with 90 total letters given out while Ole Miss and Georgia Southern tied for #2 with 87.

As far as percentages go, Charlotte leads the way with an impressive 87.5% as 56 of their 64 lettermen from the 2014 squad return. UMass comes in #2 at 84.6% and Colorado St #3 with 83.3%. Near the top last year was Mississippi State which had 82.6% lettermen returning and spent 5 weeks at #1 in the polls. Air Force was #4 last year with 80.8% back and went from
2-10 to 10-3! At the bottom is UTSA who loses an incredible 31 letterman and return just 32 (50.8%). Wyoming has the 2nd fewest at 54.1% and Florida is #126 with just 56.3%. Last year Oklahoma St was at the bottom and their record fell from 10-3 to 7-6 barely making a bowl game.

I expanded this year’s chart a little as it shows where each team ranks in total lettermen returning, total lettermen lost and the chart overall is ranked by the main number which is, % of Lettermen returning.

% of Lettermen Returning

NCAA NCAA NCAA Total %
Rank Team (Conf Rank) Conf Returning Rank Lost Rank Lettermen Returning
1. Charlotte (1) CUSA 56 13 8 1 64 87.5%
2. Massachusetts (1) MAC 55 16 10 2 65 84.6%
3. Colorado St (1) MTW 55 16 11 3 66 83.3%
4. Marshall (2) CUSA 67 1 15 14 82 81.7%
5. Connecticut (1) AAC 52 27 13 5 65 80.0%
6. Arizona St (1) PAC 12 53 23 14 10 67 79.1%
7. Nebraska (1) BIG 10 60 6 16 18 76 78.9%
8. California (2) PAC 12 58 8 16 18 74 78.4%
9. Temple (2) AAC 47 55 13 5 60 78.3%
9. Toledo (2) MAC 47 55 13 5 60 78.3%
11. W Michigan (3) MAC 43 89 12 4 55 78.2%
12. Georgia St (1) SUN 50 37 14 10 64 78.1%
13. Bowling Green (4) MAC 46 67 13 5 59 78.0%
14. Boise St (2) MTW 49 43 14 10 63 77.8%
15. UCLA (3) PAC 12 51 33 15 14 66 77.3%
16. East Carolina (3) AAC 61 4 18 32 79 77.2%
17. Tulsa (4) AAC 57 12 17 24 74 77.0%
18. TCU (1) BIG 12 62 2 19 44 81 76.5%
19. Michigan St (2) BIG 10 52 27 16 18 68 76.5%
19. Michigan (2) BIG 10 52 27 16 18 68 76.5%
21. Baylor (2) BIG 12 56 13 18 32 74 75.7%
22. Northwestern (4) BIG 10 62 2 20 57 82 75.6%
23. Appalachian St (2) SUN 46 67 15 14 61 75.4%
24. Virginia Tech (1) ACC 58 8 19 44 77 75.3%
25. Notre Dame (1) IND 42 96 14 10 56 75.0%
25. Miami, Oh (5) MAC 39 111 13 5 52 75.0%
27. Georgia Tech (2) ACC 50 37 17 24 67 74.6%
27. Purdue (5) BIG 10 50 37 17 24 67 74.6%
27. Texas Tech (3) BIG 12 50 37 17 24 67 74.6%
30. USC (4) PAC 12 49 43 17 24 66 74.2%
31. SMU (5) AAC 43 89 15 14 58 74.1%
32. New Mexico St (3) SUN 51 33 18 32 69 73.9%
33. Southern Miss (3) CUSA 59 7 21 64 80 73.8%
34. WKU (4) CUSA 53 23 19 44 72 73.6%
35. Ohio (6) MAC 50 37 18 32 68 73.5%
36. Pittsburgh (3) ACC 47 55 17 24 64 73.4%
37. Memphis (6) AAC 55 16 20 57 75 73.3%
38. Missouri (1) SEC 46 67 17 24 63 73.0%
39. New Mexico (3) MTW 54 21 20 57 74 73.0%
40. North Carolina (4) ACC 47 55 18 32 65 72.3%
41. West Virginia (4) BIG 12 44 81 17 24 61 72.1%
42. USF (7) AAC 49 43 19 44 68 72.1%
42. UTEP (5) CUSA 49 43 19 44 68 72.1%
42. N Illinois (7) MAC 49 43 19 44 68 72.1%
45. Arkansas St (4) SUN 54 21 21 64 75 72.0%
46. Alabama (2) SEC 56 13 22 74 78 71.8%
47. LSU (3) SEC 48 52 19 44 67 71.6%
48. Texas A&M (4) SEC 53 23 21 64 74 71.6%
48. Louisiana (5) SUN 53 23 21 64 74 71.6%
50. Nevada (4) MTW 40 106 16 18 56 71.4%
51. Vanderbilt (5) SEC 52 27 21 64 73 71.2%
52. Wisconsin (6) BIG 10 47 55 19 44 66 71.2%
53. Oklahoma St (5) BIG 12 46 67 19 44 65 70.8%
54. Oregon (5) PAC 12 55 16 23 90 78 70.5%
55. Buffalo (8) MAC 43 89 18 32 61 70.5%
56. Colorado (6) PAC 12 52 27 22 74 74 70.3%
57. Utah St (5) MTW 42 96 18 32 60 70.0%
58. Mississippi (6) SEC 58 8 25 105 83 69.9%
58. Georgia Southern (6) SUN 58 8 25 105 83 69.9%
60. Arizona (7) PAC 12 44 81 19 44 63 69.8%
61. Kent St (9) MAC 45 74 20 57 65 69.2%
62. Tulane (8) AAC 47 55 21 64 68 69.1%
63. Arkansas (7) SEC 49 43 22 74 71 69.0%
64. Penn St (7) BIG 10 40 106 18 32 58 69.0%
64. Iowa (7) BIG 10 40 106 18 32 58 69.0%
66. Tennessee (8) SEC 51 33 23 90 74 68.9%
67. Duke (5) ACC 50 37 23 90 73 68.5%
68. Middle Tenn (6) CUSA 45 74 21 64 66 68.2%
69. Iowa St (6) BIG 12 47 55 22 74 69 68.1%
69. Ball St (10) MAC 47 55 22 74 69 68.1%
71. Indiana (9) BIG 10 51 33 24 100 75 68.0%
72. Old Dominion (7) CUSA 38 113 18 32 56 67.9%
72. Cent Michigan (11) MAC 38 113 18 32 56 67.9%
74. Utah (8) PAC 12 61 4 29 125 90 67.8%
75. FAU (8) CUSA 42 96 20 57 62 67.7%
76. Washington (9) PAC 12 46 67 22 74 68 67.6%
77. Boston College (6) ACC 37 116 18 32 55 67.3%
78. Florida St (7) ACC 39 111 19 44 58 67.2%
79. NC State (8) ACC 43 89 21 64 64 67.2%
80. Oklahoma  (7) BIG 12 45 74 22 74 67 67.2%
80. Mississippi St (9) SEC 45 74 22 74 67 67.2%
82. Kentucky (10) SEC 47 55 23 90 70 67.1%
83. Illinois (10) BIG 10 49 43 24 100 73 67.1%
83. FIU (9) CUSA 49 43 24 100 73 67.1%
85. Troy (7) SUN 55 16 27 115 82 67.1%
86. Louisville (9) ACC 44 81 22 74 66 66.7%
86. Ohio St (11) BIG 10 44 81 22 74 66 66.7%
86. Kansas (8) BIG 12 44 81 22 74 66 66.7%
86. Kansas St (8) BIG 12 46 67 23 90 69 66.7%
86. San Jose St (6) MTW 44 81 22 74 66 66.7%
91. Hawaii (7) MTW 45 74 23 90 68 66.2%
92. Rice (10) CUSA 41 104 21 64 62 66.1%
93. Houston (9) AAC 37 116 19 44 56 66.1%
93. Wake Forest (10) ACC 37 116 19 44 56 66.1%
95. San Diego St (8) MTW 38 113 20 57 58 65.5%
96. Syracuse (11) ACC 49 43 26 110 75 65.3%
97. Akron (12) MAC 47 55 25 105 72 65.3%
98. Louisiana Tech (11) CUSA 43 89 23 90 66 65.2%
99. Washington St (10) PAC 12 41 104 22 74 63 65.1%
100. Rutgers (12) BIG 10 52 27 28 119 80 65.0%
101. North Texas (12) CUSA 37 116 20 57 57 64.9%
102. Cincinnati (10) AAC 42 96 23 90 65 64.6%
102. Texas (10) BIG 12 42 96 23 90 65 64.6%
102. Georgia (11) SEC 42 96 23 90 65 64.6%
105. Army (2) IND 48 52 27 115 75 64.0%
106. Navy (11) AAC 46 67 26 110 72 63.9%
107. Virginia (12) ACC 44 81 25 105 69 63.8%
108. Miami, Fl (13) ACC 42 96 24 100 66 63.6%
109. Stanford (11) PAC 12 47 55 27 115 74 63.5%
110. Texas St (8) SUN 45 74 26 110 71 63.4%
111. Minnesota (13) BIG 10 48 52 28 119 76 63.2%
112. UCF (12) AAC 37 116 22 74 59 62.7%
113. BYU (3) IND 47 55 28 119 75 62.7%
114. UNLV (9) MTW 45 74 27 115 72 62.5%
115. Oregon St (12) PAC 12 43 89 26 110 69 62.3%
115. South Carolina (12) SEC 43 89 26 110 69 62.3%
117. Clemson (14) ACC 44 81 28 119 72 61.1%
118. E Michigan (13) MAC 24 128 16 18 40 60.0%
118. Air Force (10) MTW 36 121 24 100 60 60.0%
118. Idaho (9) SUN 33 123 22 74 55 60.0%
121. ULM (10) SUN 31 126 21 64 52 59.6%
122. S Alabama (11) SUN 40 106 28 119 68 58.8%
123. Maryland (14) BIG 10 34 122 25 105 59 57.6%
124. Auburn (13) SEC 42 96 31 126 73 57.5%
125. Fresno St (11) MTW 29 127 22 74 51 56.9%
126. Florida (14) SEC 40 106 31 126 71 56.3%
127. Wyoming (12) MTW 33 123 28 119 61 54.1%
128. UTSA (13) CUSA 32 125 31 126 63 50.8%

 

2015 College Football Preview Available Shortly on iTunes!



In 2013 was the first year my College Football Preview magazine was available on iTunes to download to your iPhone or iPad. In that initial year, we naturally dealt with some issues through trial and error and it was not available to purchase until mid-August. Last year it came out in early June and was PERFECT with non of the bugs of the previous year. I loved it as I do not use my iPhone much (I am always at my desk computer) but I was able to navigate it easily with no problems!

This year’s version will be available shortly!
1). It will be available WEEKS before the magazine hits the newsstands on July 1st! I would expect it up at the LATEST by early next week and will tweet it out @philsteele042 the second it is up.

2). It’s easy to use and works perfectly for both the iPhone and iPad. The download process may take up to 10-15 minutes but that’s because we have 352 pages with jampacked information!

3). No bugs, no issues, take it with you where ever you go!

4). Non-U.S. Customers: The magazine will not be on the newsstands internationally, the only way to get the 2015 College Football Preview is to order through our offices and pay at least $35 (includes S&H) or get it on iTunes  for just $9.99.

5). It’s only $9.99! On the newsstand, the magazine will cost you $12.99.

Don’t wait three weeks until the magazine hits the newsstands.
Coming Soon to both iPad and Google Play!

Please note: after downloading and purchasing the App, please make sure you search for 2015 if the old 2014 cover/edition comes up on your screen.