Phil Steele's Daily Blog - Wednesday July 22nd

I continue to do my onslaught of radio shows which occupies a good portion of my days during the end of July. As you know I’ve always spent about 90% of my time on college football but I am very excited about our NFL Magazine. I have the same desire to mirror my success of being college footballs “most accurate” magazine by becoming the most accurate NFL Magazine as well. In this years magazine (which is now available) I project each of the division races with records. I want to share just how much work and research goes into making these forecasts.

I’ve posted several articles on my blog including: repeating as a division champ, the YPP and how the YPG can help you analyze a teams fortunes. These are just part of the research I do annually to make my predictions. The schedule is of course an important part of analyzing the upcoming season. Below I list the final strength of schedule for the 2008 season. I also list the NFL’s ranking of this years schedule based on LY’s win % but then also give you my strength of schedule based on this years talent.

First let me point out the biggest flaws in the NFL’s rankings. They rank New England as the #3 schedule based on having to play Miami twice as they finished 11-5 and also playing the NY Jets twice who finished 9-7 with Brett Favre and will now go with a rookie. Based on this year’s talent I have them facing the #20 schedule. On the flip side the NFL had Detroit playing the #21 schedule but with the improvement of the entire NFC North we rank them as having the 10th toughest schedule.

Phil Steele’s 2008’s
Toughest Schedules

Phil Steele’s 2009
 Toughest Schedule

The NFL’s
Toughest Schedule

1
CLEVELAND
1
TAMPA BAY
1
MIAMI
2
CINCINNATI
2
MIAMI
2
CAROLINA
3
DETROIT
3
ATLANTA
3
NEW ENGLAND
4
PITTSBURGH
4
CAROLINA
4
ATLANTA
5
PHILADELPHIA
5
NY JETS
5
TAMPA BAY
6
NY GIANTS
6
TENNESSEE
6
BUFFALO
7
DALLAS
7
NY GIANTS
7
NY JETS
8
ST LOUIS
8
DALLAS
8
NEW ORLEANS
9
BALTIMORE
9
BUFFALO
9
PHILADELPHIA
10
JACKSONVILLE
10
DETROIT
10
NY GIANTS
11
MINNESOTA
11
DENVER
11
DALLAS
12
INDIANAPOLIS
12
NEW ORLEANS
12
JACKSONVILLE
13
OAKLAND
13
PHILADELPHIA
13
INDIANAPOLIS
14
SEATTLE
14
INDIANAPOLIS
14
TENNESSEE
15
KANSAS CITY
15
KANSAS CITY
15
HOUSTON
16
CAROLINA
16
ST LOUIS
16
WASHINGTON
17
HOUSTON
17
HOUSTON
17
KANSAS CITY
18
WASHINGTON
18
WASHINGTON
17
SAN DIEGO
19
GREEN BAY
19
JACKSONVILLE
19
OAKLAND
20
SAN DIEGO
20
NEW ENGLAND
19
DENVER
21
ARIZONA
21
SAN FRANCISCO
21
DETROIT
22
NEW ORLEANS
22
OAKLAND
22
CINCINNATI
23
CHICAGO
23
ARIZONA
22
ST LOUIS
24
TAMPA BAY
24
SEATTLE
24
SEATTLE
25
ATLANTA
25
BALTIMORE
25
CLEVELAND
26
NEW ENGLAND
26
CLEVELAND
26
SAN FRANCISCO
27
TENNESSEE
27
CHICAGO
27
ARIZONA
28
MIAMI
28
CINCINNATI
28
BALTIMORE
29
SAN FRANCISCO
29
MINNESOTA
29
PITTSBURGH
30
NY JETS
30
SAN DIEGO
30
GREEN BAY
31
DENVER
31
GREEN BAY
31
MINNESOTA
32
BUFFALO
32
PITTSBURGH
32
CHICAGO

Let me share I few interesting notes after analyzing the schedule the last few years.. The NFL now schedules divisions to face each other. Therefore even though New England finished 16-0 in 2007 and Miami finished 1-15 they both played their own division, the NFC West and the AFC West giving them only 2 different opponents. I wanted to see how a team did playing a much easier or more difficult schedule based on their final strength of schedule versus my upcoming strength of schedule. Here are some numbers over the past three seasons when I compared the previous year’s final rank to this years projected strength of schedule.

Teams that had an easier schedule by 10 or more spots and had 7 or fewer wins:
13-1-1 93%
Meaning that 13 teams took advantage of the easier schedule and improved.
This years teams are: Green Bay, Seattle, Cleveland and Cincinnati

Teams that had a tougher schedule of 14 or more spots and had over 9 wins:
1-9 90%
Meaning that 9 of 10 teams had fewer wins with the tougher schedule.
This years teams are: Tennessee, Atlanta and Miami.

Make sure to pick up Phil Steele’s NFL Preview or order here on-line when you’re looking at the division forecast think about how this article is only 5% of what I put into my forecasts.