Daily Blog •February 18, 2013 |
---|
I am always looking for different ways in how to analyze a team for the upcoming season and if you read my magazine you know I use many past season statistics and performances in order to predict the future.
In today’s blog, I wanted to find out how teams did against their schedules from this past year with regards to quality of wins. What I did in this particular formula was to take the amount of wins each team had from 2012 and then gave them the total number of wins that their opponent had for the season. For example, Notre Dame beat Stanford this past year and the Cardinal won 12 games so the Irish would get all 12 of those wins. The Irish also beat Oklahoma, which won 10 games and Michigan which won 8 games. Those three wins would give them a total of 29 combined wins and when you add in Notre Dame’s 9 other teams’ wins that they beat this past season you get a total of 86 combined wins, which was actually good enough for best in the country along with Stanford whose 12 wins this past year also came over opponents with a combined 86 wins.
First a quick note with my formula: Any wins over FCS teams do not count into my formula. Only wins over FBS teams count. Therefore a team a team like Kansas, which had their only win this entire season come over an FCS opponent would not count as a total of 0 and not 9 which their FCS opponent South Dakota St won.
Naturally you do not receive any wins for a team you lost to so Notre Dame which lost only one game this past year to Alabama does not get credit for the Tide’s 13 wins.
Here are the results from my formula and there are not many surprises as it is a “whose who” of the top teams in college football from a year ago.
Total Combined Wins over Teams Beaten
Rk |
Team |
Total Wins |
Combined Foe Wins |
1 | Notre Dame | 12 | 86 |
1 | Stanford | 12 | 86 |
3 | Alabama | 13 | 84 |
4 | Florida | 11 | 82 |
5 | Oregon | 12 | 76 |
6 | Ohio St | 12 | 73 |
7 | South Carolina | 11 | 67 |
7 | Kansas St | 11 | 67 |
9 | Texas A&M | 11 | 66 |
9 | Georgia | 12 | 66 |
11 | Florida St | 12 | 64 |
12 | Nebraska | 10 | 61 |
13 | Tulsa | 11 | 60 |
13 | San Jose St | 11 | 60 |
13 | Clemson | 11 | 60 |
16 | Oklahoma | 10 | 57 |
17 | LSU | 10 | 56 |
17 | Louisville | 11 | 56 |
19 | Texas | 9 | 55 |
19 | Arkansas St | 10 | 55 |
21 | Utah St | 11 | 54 |
21 | UCLA | 9 | 54 |
23 | Baylor | 8 | 53 |
24 | Oregon St | 9 | 52 |
24 | Kent St | 11 | 52 |
24 | Boise St | 11 | 52 |
27 | Northern Illinois | 12 | 51 |
28 | Northwestern | 10 | 50 |
29 | Penn St | 8 | 46 |
30 | Michigan St | 7 | 45 |
31 | Oklahoma St | 8 | 44 |
31 | Ball St | 9 | 44 |
31 | Arizona | 8 | 44 |
34 | UCF | 10 | 43 |
34 | Cincinnati | 10 | 43 |
36 | Wisconsin | 8 | 42 |
36 | ULM | 9 | 42 |
36 | Michigan | 8 | 42 |
39 | Syracuse | 8 | 41 |
40 | Toledo | 9 | 40 |
41 | Washington | 7 | 39 |
41 | San Diego St | 9 | 39 |
41 | Louisiana | 9 | 39 |
44 | Rutgers | 9 | 38 |
44 | North Carolina | 8 | 38 |
44 | Fresno St | 9 | 38 |
47 | Virginia Tech | 7 | 36 |
47 | TCU | 7 | 36 |
49 | Vanderbilt | 9 | 35 |
49 | USC | 7 | 35 |
49 | Texas Tech | 8 | 35 |
49 | Middle Tennessee | 8 | 35 |
49 | BYU | 8 | 35 |
54 | Navy | 8 | 34 |
54 | Louisiana Tech | 9 | 34 |
56 | West Virginia | 7 | 33 |
57 | SMU | 7 | 32 |
57 | Miami, FL | 7 | 32 |
59 | Ohio | 9 | 31 |
59 | Iowa St | 6 | 31 |
59 | Georgia Tech | 7 | 31 |
62 | NC State | 7 | 30 |
62 | Arizona St | 8 | 30 |
64 | Mississippi St | 8 | 29 |
65 | Rice | 7 | 27 |
65 | Pittsburgh | 6 | 27 |
67 | Mississippi | 7 | 26 |
67 | Connecticut | 5 | 26 |
69 | Missouri | 5 | 25 |
69 | Iowa | 4 | 25 |
71 | WKU | 7 | 24 |
71 | Duke | 6 | 24 |
73 | Virginia | 4 | 22 |
73 | Minnesota | 6 | 22 |
73 | East Carolina | 8 | 22 |
73 | Bowling Green | 8 | 22 |
73 | Air Force | 6 | 22 |
78 | Troy | 5 | 20 |
78 | Nevada | 7 | 20 |
80 | Houston | 5 | 19 |
80 | Central Michigan | 7 | 19 |
82 | Purdue | 6 | 17 |
83 | Wake Forest | 5 | 16 |
83 | Marshall | 5 | 16 |
83 | Arkansas | 4 | 16 |
86 | Utah | 5 | 15 |
86 | Tennessee | 5 | 15 |
88 | North Texas | 4 | 14 |
89 | Western Michigan | 4 | 13 |
89 | Maryland | 4 | 13 |
91 | USF | 3 | 12 |
91 | Memphis | 4 | 12 |
91 | FAU | 3 | 12 |
91 | California | 3 | 12 |
95 | Wyoming | 4 | 11 |
95 | Miami, OH | 4 | 11 |
95 | Kentucky | 2 | 11 |
98 | UNLV | 2 | 10 |
98 | Tulane | 2 | 10 |
98 | Temple | 4 | 10 |
98 | Colorado St | 4 | 10 |
98 | Auburn | 3 | 10 |
103 | Wash St | 3 | 9 |
103 | Buffalo | 4 | 9 |
105 | UTSA | 8 | 8 |
105 | New Mexico | 4 | 8 |
105 | Army | 2 | 8 |
108 | Texas St | 4 | 7 |
108 | Indiana | 4 | 7 |
110 | FIU | 3 | 6 |
110 | Eastern Michigan | 2 | 6 |
112 | UAB | 3 | 5 |
113 | Illinois | 2 | 4 |
113 | Hawaii | 3 | 4 |
113 | Boston College | 2 | 4 |
116 | UTEP | 3 | 3 |
116 | South Alabama | 2 | 3 |
116 | Colorado | 1 | 3 |
119 | Massachusetts | 1 | 1 |
119 | Idaho | 1 | 1 |
121 | Southern Miss | 0 | 0 |
121 | New Mexico St | 1 | 0 |
121 | Kansas | 1 | 0 |
121 | Akron | 1 | 0 |
The next thing I did was to take an average number of wins each opponent had for a team that it had beaten. For example, UNLV won two games a year ago. One of the wins was over a 6-win Air Force team and the other came over New Mexico, which won 4 games. This gave them a total of 10 wins and when u divide it by two you naturally get a win average of 5.
By using this method you can see which teams feasted upon weaker opponents and which teams had some quality wins.
Here are the results.
Average # of Wins for Foes Beaten
Rk | Team | Total Wins |
Comb Foe Wins |
Foe Win Avg |
1 | Florida | 11 | 82 | 7.45 |
2 | Stanford | 12 | 86 | 7.17 |
2 | Notre Dame | 12 | 86 | 7.17 |
4 | Baylor | 8 | 53 | 6.63 |
5 | Alabama | 13 | 84 | 6.46 |
6 | Michigan St | 7 | 45 | 6.43 |
7 | Oregon | 12 | 76 | 6.33 |
8 | Iowa | 4 | 25 | 6.25 |
9 | Texas | 9 | 55 | 6.11 |
10 | Nebraska | 10 | 61 | 6.10 |
11 | South Carolina | 11 | 67 | 6.09 |
11 | Kansas St | 11 | 67 | 6.09 |
13 | Ohio St | 12 | 73 | 6.08 |
14 | Texas A&M | 11 | 66 | 6.00 |
14 | UCLA | 9 | 54 | 6.00 |
16 | Oregon St | 9 | 52 | 5.78 |
17 | Penn St | 8 | 46 | 5.75 |
18 | Oklahoma | 10 | 57 | 5.70 |
19 | LSU | 10 | 56 | 5.60 |
20 | Washington | 7 | 39 | 5.57 |
21 | Georgia | 12 | 66 | 5.50 |
21 | Arkansas St | 10 | 55 | 5.50 |
21 | Oklahoma St | 8 | 44 | 5.50 |
21 | Arizona | 8 | 44 | 5.50 |
21 | Virginia | 4 | 22 | 5.50 |
21 | Kentucky | 2 | 11 | 5.50 |
27 | Tulsa | 11 | 60 | 5.45 |
27 | San Jose St | 11 | 60 | 5.45 |
27 | Clemson | 11 | 60 | 5.45 |
30 | Florida St | 12 | 64 | 5.33 |
31 | Wisconsin | 8 | 42 | 5.25 |
31 | Michigan | 8 | 42 | 5.25 |
33 | Connecticut | 5 | 26 | 5.20 |
34 | Iowa St | 6 | 31 | 5.17 |
35 | Virginia Tech | 7 | 36 | 5.14 |
35 | TCU | 7 | 36 | 5.14 |
37 | Syracuse | 8 | 41 | 5.13 |
38 | Louisville | 11 | 56 | 5.09 |
39 | Northwestern | 10 | 50 | 5.00 |
39 | USC | 7 | 35 | 5.00 |
39 | Missouri | 5 | 25 | 5.00 |
39 | UNLV | 2 | 10 | 5.00 |
39 | Tulane | 2 | 10 | 5.00 |
44 | Utah St | 11 | 54 | 4.91 |
45 | Ball St | 9 | 44 | 4.89 |
46 | North Carolina | 8 | 38 | 4.75 |
47 | Kent St | 11 | 52 | 4.73 |
47 | Boise St | 11 | 52 | 4.73 |
49 | West Virginia | 7 | 33 | 4.71 |
50 | ULM | 9 | 42 | 4.67 |
51 | SMU | 7 | 32 | 4.57 |
51 | Miami, FL | 7 | 32 | 4.57 |
53 | Pittsburgh | 6 | 27 | 4.50 |
54 | Toledo | 9 | 40 | 4.44 |
55 | Georgia Tech | 7 | 31 | 4.43 |
56 | Texas Tech | 8 | 35 | 4.38 |
56 | Middle Tennessee | 8 | 35 | 4.38 |
56 | BYU | 8 | 35 | 4.38 |
59 | San Diego St | 9 | 39 | 4.33 |
59 | Louisiana | 9 | 39 | 4.33 |
61 | UCF | 10 | 43 | 4.30 |
61 | Cincinnati | 10 | 43 | 4.30 |
63 | NC State | 7 | 30 | 4.29 |
64 | Northern Illinois | 12 | 51 | 4.25 |
64 | Navy | 8 | 34 | 4.25 |
66 | Rutgers | 9 | 38 | 4.22 |
66 | Fresno St | 9 | 38 | 4.22 |
68 | Duke | 6 | 24 | 4.00 |
68 | Troy | 5 | 20 | 4.00 |
68 | Arkansas | 4 | 16 | 4.00 |
68 | USF | 3 | 12 | 4.00 |
68 | FAU | 3 | 12 | 4.00 |
68 | California | 3 | 12 | 4.00 |
68 | Army | 2 | 8 | 4.00 |
75 | Vanderbilt | 9 | 35 | 3.89 |
76 | Rice | 7 | 27 | 3.86 |
77 | Houston | 5 | 19 | 3.80 |
78 | Louisiana Tech | 9 | 34 | 3.78 |
79 | Arizona St | 8 | 30 | 3.75 |
80 | Mississippi | 7 | 26 | 3.71 |
81 | Minnesota | 6 | 22 | 3.67 |
81 | Air Force | 6 | 22 | 3.67 |
83 | Mississippi St | 8 | 29 | 3.63 |
84 | North Texas | 4 | 14 | 3.50 |
85 | Ohio | 9 | 31 | 3.44 |
86 | WKU | 7 | 24 | 3.43 |
87 | Auburn | 3 | 10 | 3.33 |
88 | Western Michigan | 4 | 13 | 3.25 |
88 | Maryland | 4 | 13 | 3.25 |
90 | Wake Forest | 5 | 16 | 3.20 |
90 | Marshall | 5 | 16 | 3.20 |
92 | Utah | 5 | 15 | 3.00 |
92 | Tennessee | 5 | 15 | 3.00 |
92 | Memphis | 4 | 12 | 3.00 |
92 | Wash St | 3 | 9 | 3.00 |
92 | Eastern Michigan | 2 | 6 | 3.00 |
92 | Colorado | 1 | 3 | 3.00 |
98 | Nevada | 7 | 20 | 2.86 |
99 | Purdue | 6 | 17 | 2.83 |
100 | East Carolina | 8 | 22 | 2.75 |
100 | Bowling Green | 8 | 22 | 2.75 |
100 | Wyoming | 4 | 11 | 2.75 |
100 | Miami, OH | 4 | 11 | 2.75 |
104 | Central Michigan | 7 | 19 | 2.71 |
105 | Temple | 4 | 10 | 2.50 |
105 | Colorado St | 4 | 10 | 2.50 |
107 | Buffalo | 4 | 9 | 2.25 |
108 | New Mexico | 4 | 8 | 2.00 |
108 | FIU | 3 | 6 | 2.00 |
108 | Illinois | 2 | 4 | 2.00 |
108 | Boston College | 2 | 4 | 2.00 |
112 | Texas St | 4 | 7 | 1.75 |
112 | Indiana | 4 | 7 | 1.75 |
114 | UAB | 3 | 5 | 1.67 |
115 | South Alabama | 2 | 3 | 1.50 |
116 | Hawaii | 3 | 4 | 1.33 |
117 | UTSA | 8 | 8 | 1.00 |
117 | UTEP | 3 | 3 | 1.00 |
117 | Massachusetts | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
117 | Idaho | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
121 | Southern Miss | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
121 | New Mexico St | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
121 | Kansas | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
121 | Akron | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
The Gators actually topped the charts here as their 11 wins came over teams that averaged 7.45 wins this past year. Stanford and Notre Dame are next and there are also a couple more surprises. First, Baylor proved to have some quality wins as their 8 wins this past year came over teams that averaged 6.63 wins including their win over an 11-win Kansas St team. Michigan St’s 7 wins this past year came over teams that won an average 6.43 games. At the bottom, UTSA, which won 8 games this past year only had a total of 8 combined wins because four of those wins came over lower level competition. Their 8 wins only averaged 1 per team as South Alabama won just 2 games, New Mexico St 1, Idaho 1 and Texas St 4.
Tomorrow I will be back to take a look at the opposite end of this data and analyze the losses for each team from this past year.