Daily Blog • October 27, 2014 |
---|
As far as my game grades go after the 2008 season was completed, I devised a power ratings system, which lets me analyze at what level each team played during an individual game. This “game grade” takes into account the yards rushing, yards passing, points scored, rushing yards allowed, passing yards allowed and points allowed and factors them in against the opponent played and even factors in the site the game was played at.
With all these factors taken into consideration you will see teams that lost the game having a better individual game grade than teams that beat them simply because the team they played was superior and much less was expected of them.
Week 9 Top Team Performances
According To My Computer's Game Grades
OFF | OFF | OFF | DEF | DEF | DEF | TOTAL | GAME | |||||
RANK | TEAM | OPPONENT | RUSH | PASS | PTS | RUSH | PASS | PTS | TO's | YARDS | GRADE | |
1 | TCU | Texas Tech | 305 | 480 | 82 | 101 | 345 | 27 | 4 | 339 | 117.10 | |
2 | Wisconsin | Maryland | 311 | 216 | 52 | 46 | 129 | 7 | 1 | 352 | 114.84 | |
3 | Stanford | Oregon St | 151 | 287 | 38 | 12 | 209 | 14 | -2 | 217 | 105.11 | |
4 | Miami, Fl | at | Virginia Tech | 364 | 92 | 30 | 120 | 142 | 6 | 3 | 194 | 104.06 |
5 | Kansas St | Texas | 143 | 224 | 23 | 90 | 106 | 0 | 1 | 171 | 103.90 | |
5 | Boise St | BYU | 227 | 410 | 55 | 63 | 259 | 30 | 1 | 315 | 103.90 | |
7 | LSU | Mississippi | 264 | 142 | 10 | 137 | 176 | 7 | -3 | 93 | 102.36 | |
8 | Michigan St | Michigan | 219 | 227 | 35 | 65 | 121 | 11 | 1 | 260 | 102.19 | |
9 | Alabama | at | Tennessee | 183 | 286 | 34 | 181 | 202 | 20 | 0 | 86 | 99.33 |
10 | UTEP | at | UTSA | 160 | 191 | 34 | 38 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 281 | 99.33 |
11 | Georgia Tech | at | Pittsburgh | 465 | 147 | 56 | 198 | 328 | 28 | 5 | 86 | 97.35 |
12 | Arkansas | UAB | 273 | 211 | 45 | 133 | 62 | 17 | 0 | 289 | 96.69 | |
13 | Clemson | Syracuse | 166 | 209 | 16 | 88 | 82 | 6 | -1 | 205 | 95.98 | |
14 | Arizona | at | Washington St | 157 | 294 | 59 | 54 | 489 | 37 | 1 | -92 | 94.85 |
15 | UCF | Temple | 130 | 336 | 34 | 32 | 150 | 14 | 2 | 284 | 93.50 | |
16 | Oregon | at | California | 264 | 326 | 59 | 193 | 367 | 41 | 0 | 30 | 92.57 |
17 | Memphis | at | SMU | 230 | 352 | 48 | 137 | 114 | 10 | 1 | 331 | 92.57 |
18 | Nebraska | Rutgers | 292 | 163 | 42 | 143 | 205 | 24 | -1 | 107 | 92.02 | |
19 | West Virginia | at | Oklahoma St | 210 | 238 | 34 | 194 | 242 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 91.80 |
20 | South Carolina | at | Auburn | 119 | 416 | 35 | 395 | 156 | 42 | -2 | -16 | 90.48 |
21 | Cincinnati | USF | 273 | 317 | 34 | 42 | 239 | 17 | 1 | 309 | 89.65 | |
22 | Utah | USC | 137 | 194 | 24 | 100 | 264 | 21 | 0 | -33 | 89.38 | |
23 | Mississippi St | at | Kentucky | 326 | 216 | 45 | 103 | 401 | 31 | 0 | 38 | 89.18 |
24 | Arizona St | at | Washington | 105 | 180 | 24 | 151 | 139 | 10 | 2 | -5 | 89.04 |
25 | Ohio St | at | Penn St | 219 | 74 | 31 | 16 | 224 | 24 | 0 | 53 | 88.74 |