Phil Steele Blog • October 11, 2016 |
---|
Strength of Wins/ Pain of Losses Thru Week 6.
Strength of Wins
I find this chart to be very interesting every year. How it’s devised is if you beat an FBS opponent you get credit for all their wins over their FBS opponents.
In this first chart below you can see Strength of Wins. Here you can see Michigan holds the lone #1 spot on this list. Michigan has faced Hawaii, UCF, Colorado, Penn St, Wisconsin and Rutgers and those teams have a total of 20 wins. At the bottom you will see your winless teams Rice and Miami Oh. While there are only 2 winless teams, my chart grades 9 teams as having credit with a win but their foes have not won a single game vs a FBS foe.
Here is the Complete list of Strength of Wins with rank:Games Played Thru 10/9/16
Strength of Wins | Strength of Wins | Strength of Wins | |||||||||
SU | Combined | SU | Combined | SU | Combined | ||||||
Wins | Foe Wins | Rank | Wins | Foe Wins | Rank | Wins | Foe Wins | Rank | |||
Michigan | 6 | 20 | 1 | Auburn | 4 | 7 | 41 | Cincinnati | 3 | 3 | 86 |
Texas A&M | 6 | 18 | 2 | Eastern Mich | 4 | 7 | 41 | Tulane | 3 | 3 | 86 |
Clemson | 6 | 18 | 2 | Middle Tenn | 4 | 7 | 41 | Ball St | 3 | 3 | 86 |
Alabama | 6 | 18 | 2 | Indiana | 3 | 7 | 41 | Idaho | 3 | 3 | 86 |
Tennessee | 5 | 18 | 2 | Oklahoma | 3 | 7 | 41 | Texas | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Ohio St | 5 | 13 | 6 | UCLA | 3 | 7 | 41 | Syracuse | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Washington | 6 | 12 | 7 | Northwestern | 2 | 7 | 41 | Arizona | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Penn St | 4 | 12 | 7 | Virginia | 2 | 7 | 41 | Oregon St | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Florida St | 4 | 12 | 7 | Vanderbilt | 2 | 7 | 41 | Miss St | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Arizona St | 5 | 11 | 10 | Iowa | 4 | 6 | 53 | SMU | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Wake Forest | 5 | 11 | 10 | Miami, Fl | 4 | 6 | 53 | UL Lafayette | 2 | 3 | 86 |
Houston | 5 | 11 | 10 | San Diego St | 4 | 6 | 53 | Buffalo | 1 | 3 | 86 |
Boise St | 5 | 11 | 10 | Toledo | 4 | 6 | 53 | N Illinois | 1 | 3 | 86 |
Wisconsin | 4 | 11 | 10 | Kentucky | 3 | 6 | 53 | Ohio | 4 | 2 | 100 |
Navy | 4 | 11 | 10 | South Alabama | 3 | 6 | 53 | Boston College | 3 | 2 | 100 |
USC | 3 | 11 | 10 | Memphis | 4 | 5 | 59 | Nevada | 3 | 2 | 100 |
Western Mich | 6 | 10 | 17 | Old Dominion | 4 | 5 | 59 | Michigan St | 2 | 2 | 100 |
Nebraska | 5 | 10 | 17 | Minnesota | 3 | 5 | 59 | Rutgers | 2 | 2 | 100 |
California | 3 | 10 | 17 | Georgia Tech | 3 | 5 | 59 | Oregon | 2 | 2 | 100 |
Utah | 5 | 9 | 20 | Duke | 3 | 5 | 59 | FIU | 2 | 2 | 100 |
Virginia Tech | 4 | 9 | 20 | Connecticut | 3 | 5 | 59 | UTEP | 1 | 2 | 100 |
North Carolina | 4 | 9 | 20 | Notre Dame | 2 | 5 | 59 | Arkansas St | 1 | 2 | 100 |
NC State | 4 | 9 | 20 | TCU | 4 | 4 | 66 | UMass | 1 | 2 | 100 |
Arkansas | 4 | 9 | 20 | Tulsa | 4 | 4 | 66 | Georgia St | 1 | 2 | 100 |
Florida | 4 | 9 | 20 | Southern Miss | 4 | 4 | 66 | North Texas | 3 | 1 | 111 |
Louisville | 4 | 9 | 20 | Purdue | 3 | 4 | 66 | UNLV | 2 | 1 | 111 |
Central Mich | 4 | 9 | 20 | Kansas St | 3 | 4 | 66 | New Mexico | 2 | 1 | 111 |
Troy | 4 | 9 | 20 | Texas Tech | 3 | 4 | 66 | Kent St | 2 | 1 | 111 |
Stanford | 3 | 9 | 20 | Temple | 3 | 4 | 66 | Utah St | 2 | 1 | 111 |
USF | 5 | 8 | 30 | LSU | 3 | 4 | 66 | Charlotte | 2 | 1 | 111 |
Pittsburgh | 4 | 8 | 30 | Hawaii | 3 | 4 | 66 | Iowa St | 1 | 1 | 111 |
West Virginia | 4 | 8 | 30 | Colorado St | 3 | 4 | 66 | WKU | 3 | 0 | 118 |
Maryland | 4 | 8 | 30 | Army | 3 | 4 | 66 | Illinois | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Georgia | 4 | 8 | 30 | Louisiana Tech | 3 | 4 | 66 | Kansas | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Air Force | 4 | 8 | 30 | UCF | 3 | 4 | 66 | Fresno St | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Wyoming | 4 | 8 | 30 | GA Southern | 3 | 4 | 66 | San Jose St | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Washington St | 3 | 8 | 30 | Missouri | 2 | 4 | 66 | Marshall | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Mississippi | 3 | 8 | 30 | South Carolina | 2 | 4 | 66 | Bowling Green | 1 | 0 | 118 |
BYU | 3 | 8 | 30 | East Carolina | 2 | 4 | 66 | ULM | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Appalachian St | 3 | 8 | 30 | New Mexico St | 2 | 4 | 66 | Florida Atlantic | 1 | 0 | 118 |
Baylor | 5 | 7 | 41 | Texas St | 2 | 4 | 66 | Rice | 0 | 0 | 118 |
Colorado | 4 | 7 | 41 | UTSA | 2 | 4 | 66 | Miami, OH | 0 | 0 | 118 |
Oklahoma St | 4 | 7 | 41 | Akron | 4 | 3 | 86 |
Pain of Losses
This next chart we will go over is the Pain of Losses. Here if you lose to an opponent you get credit for all their losses. While there are 11 teams unbeaten, there are an additional 7 teams who have only lost to an unbeaten foe. Mimai Oh is at the bottom of this list with a combined 16 foe losses. Their foe losses include Iowa, Eastern Illinois, WKU, Cincinnati, Ohio and Akron. Unlike the Strength of Wins chart, the Pain of Losses chart does include a loss to an FCS foe. I count that loss as 4 towards the combined foe loss record due to the weakness of the opponent.
Here is your complete Pain of Losses Chart with rank: Games Played Thru 10/9/16
Pain of Losses | Pain of Losses | Pain of Losses | |||||||||
SU | Combined | SU | Combined | SU | Combined | ||||||
Loss | Foe Losses | Rank | Loss | Foe Losses | Rank | Loss | Foe Losses | Rank | |||
Michigan | 0 | 0 | 1 | Toledo | 1 | 3 | 42 | Michigan St | 3 | 6 | 82 |
Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | 1 | Florida St | 2 | 3 | 42 | North Texas | 3 | 6 | 82 |
Clemson | 0 | 0 | 1 | North Carolina | 2 | 3 | 42 | SMU | 4 | 6 | 82 |
Alabama | 0 | 0 | 1 | Central Mich | 2 | 3 | 42 | Bowling Green | 5 | 6 | 82 |
Ohio St | 0 | 0 | 1 | Georgia | 2 | 3 | 42 | Iowa | 2 | 7 | 91 |
Washington | 0 | 0 | 1 | Colorado | 2 | 3 | 42 | Army | 2 | 7 | 91 |
Boise St | 0 | 0 | 1 | Texas Tech | 2 | 3 | 42 | Duke | 3 | 7 | 91 |
Western Mich | 0 | 0 | 1 | LSU | 2 | 3 | 42 | Hawaii | 3 | 7 | 91 |
Nebraska | 0 | 0 | 1 | USC | 3 | 3 | 42 | UTSA | 3 | 7 | 91 |
West Virginia | 0 | 0 | 1 | UCLA | 3 | 3 | 42 | Texas | 3 | 7 | 91 |
Baylor | 0 | 0 | 1 | Kentucky | 3 | 3 | 42 | New Mexico | 3 | 7 | 91 |
Tennessee | 1 | 0 | 1 | Georgia Tech | 3 | 3 | 42 | WKU | 3 | 7 | 91 |
Wisconsin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Idaho | 3 | 3 | 42 | Syracuse | 4 | 7 | 91 |
Louisville | 1 | 0 | 1 | NC State | 1 | 4 | 57 | Arizona | 4 | 7 | 91 |
Troy | 1 | 0 | 1 | Middle Tenn | 1 | 4 | 57 | Utah St | 4 | 7 | 91 |
Tulsa | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pittsburgh | 2 | 4 | 57 | Kansas | 4 | 7 | 91 |
Arkansas | 2 | 0 | 1 | Washington St | 2 | 4 | 57 | South Carolina | 4 | 8 | 103 |
Auburn | 2 | 0 | 1 | Eastern Mich | 2 | 4 | 57 | East Carolina | 4 | 8 | 103 |
Wake Forest | 1 | 1 | 19 | Old Dominion | 2 | 4 | 57 | Georgia St | 4 | 8 | 103 |
Houston | 1 | 1 | 19 | Minnesota | 2 | 4 | 57 | Kent St | 4 | 8 | 103 |
Navy | 1 | 1 | 19 | TCU | 2 | 4 | 57 | Marshall | 4 | 8 | 103 |
Virginia Tech | 1 | 1 | 19 | Southern Miss | 2 | 4 | 57 | N Illinois | 5 | 8 | 103 |
Florida | 1 | 1 | 19 | Purdue | 2 | 4 | 57 | New Mexico St | 3 | 9 | 109 |
Indiana | 2 | 1 | 19 | GA Southern | 2 | 4 | 57 | Ball St | 3 | 9 | 109 |
Oklahoma | 2 | 1 | 19 | Akron | 2 | 4 | 57 | Nevada | 3 | 9 | 109 |
UCF | 2 | 1 | 19 | Ohio | 2 | 4 | 57 | UNLV | 4 | 9 | 109 |
USF | 1 | 2 | 27 | BYU | 3 | 4 | 57 | Charlotte | 4 | 9 | 109 |
Maryland | 1 | 2 | 27 | Northwestern | 3 | 4 | 57 | Fresno St | 5 | 9 | 109 |
Air Force | 1 | 2 | 27 | Missouri | 3 | 4 | 57 | Notre Dame | 4 | 10 | 115 |
Miami, Fl | 1 | 2 | 27 | Oregon St | 3 | 4 | 57 | FIU | 4 | 10 | 115 |
San Diego St | 1 | 2 | 27 | Boston College | 3 | 4 | 57 | ULM | 4 | 10 | 115 |
Memphis | 1 | 2 | 27 | Oregon | 4 | 4 | 57 | Iowa St | 5 | 10 | 115 |
Penn St | 2 | 2 | 27 | Illinois | 4 | 4 | 57 | Rice | 5 | 10 | 115 |
Stanford | 2 | 2 | 27 | California | 3 | 5 | 77 | Virginia | 3 | 11 | 120 |
Wyoming | 2 | 2 | 27 | Temple | 3 | 5 | 77 | Vanderbilt | 4 | 11 | 120 |
Mississippi | 2 | 2 | 27 | Louisiana Tech | 3 | 5 | 77 | Arkansas St | 4 | 11 | 120 |
Appalachian St | 2 | 2 | 27 | Cincinnati | 3 | 5 | 77 | UMass | 5 | 12 | 123 |
Oklahoma St | 2 | 2 | 27 | UL Lafayette | 3 | 5 | 77 | San Jose St | 5 | 13 | 124 |
Kansas St | 2 | 2 | 27 | South Alabama | 2 | 6 | 82 | Florida Atlantic | 5 | 13 | 124 |
Tulane | 2 | 2 | 27 | Connecticut | 3 | 6 | 82 | Buffalo | 4 | 14 | 126 |
Rutgers | 4 | 2 | 27 | Colorado St | 3 | 6 | 82 | UTEP | 5 | 14 | 126 |
Arizona St | 1 | 3 | 42 | Texas St | 3 | 6 | 82 | Miami, OH | 6 | 16 | 128 |
Utah | 1 | 3 | 42 | Miss St | 3 | 6 | 82 |
Overall Wins and Losses
In this last chart below you can see the overall wins and losses. As you can see the top teams are Michigan, Texas A&M and Clemson. The bottom teams are all the winless teams. One of the most interesting teams here is Tennessee (highlighted in green). If you take a closer look, Tennessee has a 5-1 record, but have 0 losses in this list because their only loss came to a unbeaten Texas A&M team in 2OT. So Tennessee does not get credit for any losses.
Here is your complete Overall Wins and Losses Chart with %:Games Played Thru 10/9/16
Overall | Overall | Overall | |||||||||
Wins | Losses | % | Wins | Losses | % | Wins | Losses | % | |||
Michigan | 20 | 0 | 100.0% | Georgia | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | Army | 4 | 7 | 36.4% |
Texas A&M | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | Memphis | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | Hawaii | 4 | 7 | 36.4% |
Clemson | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | Colorado | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | UTSA | 4 | 7 | 36.4% |
Alabama | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | UCLA | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | Notre Dame | 5 | 10 | 33.3% |
Tennessee | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | NC State | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | South Carolina | 4 | 8 | 33.3% |
Ohio St | 13 | 0 | 100.0% | California | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | East Carolina | 4 | 8 | 33.3% |
Washington | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | Pittsburgh | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | Miss St | 3 | 6 | 33.3% |
Boise St | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | Washington St | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | SMU | 3 | 6 | 33.3% |
Wisconsin | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | BYU | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | Ohio | 2 | 4 | 33.3% |
Western Mich | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | Toledo | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | Boston College | 2 | 4 | 33.3% |
Nebraska | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | Kentucky | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | Oregon | 2 | 4 | 33.3% |
Louisville | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | Kansas St | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | New Mexico St | 4 | 9 | 30.8% |
Troy | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | Middle Tenn | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | Texas | 3 | 7 | 30.0% |
Arkansas | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | Eastern Mich | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | Syracuse | 3 | 7 | 30.0% |
West Virginia | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | Northwestern | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | Arizona | 3 | 7 | 30.0% |
Baylor | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | Georgia Tech | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | N Illinois | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
Auburn | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | Tulane | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | Ball St | 3 | 9 | 25.0% |
Tulsa | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | Texas Tech | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | Michigan St | 2 | 6 | 25.0% |
Wake Forest | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | LSU | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | Georgia St | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
Houston | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | Old Dominion | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | Nevada | 2 | 9 | 18.2% |
Navy | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | Minnesota | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | Buffalo | 3 | 14 | 17.6% |
Virginia Tech | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | South Alabama | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | FIU | 2 | 10 | 16.7% |
Florida | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | TCU | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | Arkansas St | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
Indiana | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | Southern Miss | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | UMass | 2 | 12 | 14.3% |
Oklahoma | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | Purdue | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | North Texas | 1 | 6 | 14.3% |
Penn St | 12 | 2 | 85.7% | GA Southern | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | UTEP | 2 | 14 | 12.5% |
Stanford | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | Missouri | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | New Mexico | 1 | 7 | 12.5% |
Florida St | 12 | 3 | 80.0% | Idaho | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | Utah St | 1 | 7 | 12.5% |
USF | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Rutgers | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | Kent St | 1 | 8 | 11.1% |
Maryland | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Iowa St | 1 | 10 | 50.0% | UNLV | 1 | 9 | 10.0% |
Air Force | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Iowa | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | Charlotte | 1 | 9 | 10.0% |
Wyoming | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Connecticut | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | Illinois | 0 | 4 | 0.0% |
Mississippi | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Temple | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | Bowling Green | 0 | 6 | 0.0% |
Appalachian St | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | Louisiana Tech | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | WKU | 0 | 7 | 0.0% |
UCF | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | Akron | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | Kansas | 0 | 7 | 0.0% |
Arizona St | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | Oregon St | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | Marshall | 0 | 8 | 0.0% |
USC | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | Duke | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | Fresno St | 0 | 9 | 0.0% |
Oklahoma St | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | Colorado St | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | ULM | 0 | 10 | 0.0% |
Utah | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | Texas St | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | Rice | 0 | 10 | 0.0% |
North Carolina | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | Virginia | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | San Jose St | 0 | 13 | 0.0% |
Central Mich | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | Vanderbilt | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | Florida Atlantic | 0 | 13 | 0.0% |
Miami, Fl | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | Cincinnati | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | Miami, OH | 0 | 16 | 0.0% |
San Diego St | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | UL Lafayette | 3 | 5 | 37.5% |
How Phil Steele Uses Phil Steele Plus.
Here is an in-depth video tutorial on how Phil Steele uses Phil Steele Plus here on philsteele.com. Please click the link below to start the video. The video is close to 16 minutes long so it might take a few minutes to fully download to watch. Now if your interested in getting on board with Phil Steele Plus please check below on how to get set up.
How do you get set up with Phil Steele Plus?
If you are a Inside the Pressbox Subscriber:
You will get Phil Steele Plus free! Just click this link <HERE> register your email and make up your password. Once you do that you will receive a confirmation in your email to verify your account. Now from there do not buy the Phil Steele Plus Subscription. Please email Todd at todd@philsteele.com with your first name, last name and what email you are registered under and he will verify you are a subscriber of Inside the Pressbox and will activate your Phil Steele Plus for the year.
If you are not a subscriber to Inside the Pressbox:
Please register your email and set up a password. Once you’re done go to manage account right from the home page of philsteele.com and click buy for the $49.99 follow the instructions and you’ll be all set.